Feb 14, 2012

Posted by in Crop Circles, Disclosure, Uncategorized | 6 Comments

Art With Malice: The Human Circlemakers

Discernment: the quality of being able to grasp and comprehend what is obscure.

After watching this film (below) ask yourself why no one has been arrested in over 25 years of producing many thousands of crop circles through acts of blatant crop vandalism in the crop fields of the U.K., yet those involved in these destructive acts have a well known website (www.circlemakers.com), and their names can be easily known to anyone interested enough to look. It is because those who are directing this charade very well know those who are carrying out these nefarious acts. Not only do those authorities allow this vandalism to continue, but they encourage it, as they know that the human-made crop circles represent their most effective means to discredit the Crop circle phenomenon in the eyes of mankind. What a shame that our world is so constructed.

In this film you will learn how and why British and U.S. military and intelligence agencies have essentially destroyed the credibility of the Crop Circle phenomenon through a program deliberately designed to relegate the Crop Circles to your mind’s round file of silly fantasies and acts of human mischief. These base and misguided efforts have been enormously successful at discrediting what were intended to be a beautiful as well as non-threatening greeting to mankind from the universe. Through their malicious “artistic” efforts in the crop fields, John Lundberg, Rob Irving, and their co-conspirators (the human Circlemakers) have done more to retard the awakening of the human race to a new and wonderous reality – that we are not alone in this universe – than they can possibly imagine. How long before they realize the extent of the damage that they have done? How long before they listen to their conscience and tell the world the truth about the genuine Crop Circles and their efforts to discredit this important phenomenon?

Researchers Robert Hulse, David Cayton, and Roy Dutton have been studying the Crop circle phenomenon since the early 1990’s. Upon close inspection of a crop circle, on their hands and knees, they have developed the ability to identify crop circles which are produced by human beings through the mechanical stomping down of crop utilizing a rope and board. They look for marks left by the edge of the board where it contacts the plants and leaves a telltale scar upon the plant’s stem surface. Yet they also acknowledge that some crop circles, the Genuine Crop Circles, do not exhibit these marks, are more graceful and flowing, reveal the presence of blown-out nodes, and are very likely produced by a non-human intelligence. These researchers tell us that they have not encountered what they believe to be a Genuine Crop Circle since 2005! Let us hope that the Genuine Circle Makers have not simply given up on the human race as a species which is completely unapproachable due to our demonstrated inability to deal with an unknown in an honest and forthright manner.

CCRF extends our gratitude to Richard D. Hall, the producer of this film
(www.richplanet.net), Robert Hulse, David Cayton, and Roy Dutton for the many hours they have personally contributed toward trying to help mankind understand the truth.

CCRF extends our deepest sympathy to John Lundberg, Rob Irving, Mark Pilkington and the Circlemakers for their loss of their sense of responsibility toward their fellow man and their apparent inability to conduct themselves like human beings. They label themselves as artists, but are in fact simply vandals who have sold their souls to the highest bidder. We invite them to finally do the right thing and reveal to the world what they know to be true about the genuine Crop Circles. It is not yet too late for redemption.

To the British and U.S. military and intelligence personnel charged with the task of discrediting the Genuine Crop Circle phenomenon, we can only say that these people operate on the dark side, they seem to know only how to destroy, their acts are despicable and will be only temporarily effective. Disclosure of the truth is inevitable and one way or another, despite their efforts, it will eventually happen.

  1. Alexander Perandin Moreira says:

    Dear friends, I really believe that some crop circles are made from not-human intelligences.
    Unfortunatelly, crop circles use to appear where there are people that developed anbilities to imitate it.
    I think that if complex circles appears at crops of unexpected countries, like Brazil, Argentina, in regions of low-density population, it would be a definitive probe of not-human intelligences.

  2. The ‘evidence’ that these guys work for MI5 is circumstantial to say the least. Just because you go to college near the MI5 building would make thousands of people MI5 employees if we follow that logic.

    • Andy,
      If Lundburg’s residential proximity to MI5 headquarters were the only link to British and U.S. intelligence agencies that Hall uncovered, I would completely agree with you. However, the registration of the Circlemakers.com domain name being linked to one John Kurzack of the USAF, the references to MI5 and British intelligence discovered in the background of the Circlemakers.com website, the financial “curiosities” of Lundburg’s life (i.e. his source of “retainer” funding), his engagment in a non-profit-producing and time consuming activity (circle making) immediately after his graduation from art school, his apartment lease being paid for by an unknown 3rd party, and Lundburg’s self-promoted deceptiveness and mystery about his activities, etc. all add up to a picture which is quite curious to say the least. Richard Hall’s digging into the details of Lundburg’s background raise a number of bright red flags other than the specific and less impressive evidence brought out in the film to which you have called our attention.
      The UFO Phenomenon is real. We know this. There has been a concerted effort made for many decades to discourage people’s interest or belief in UFOs. When Genuine Crop Circles came on the scene, it was IMPERATIVE that something be done to discredit Genuine Crop Circles, otherwise the public would have begun to put 2+2 together very quickly. Lundburg’s efforts, along with now many others (circle hoaxers who unwittingly became volunteers), have accomplished this goal extremely effectively.
      Andy, it is time for everyone to wake up to the ugly reality that our own resources (our tax dollars) have been used against us in an ill-advised, long-standing effort to engineer our perceptions and distort our understanding of reality. It is unfortunate, but IMO, this is our situation.

  3. Do you have a link to the interview or reference where the researchers indicate they have not encountered what they believe to be a genuine crop circle since 2005? Thanks in advance!

    Also, I am searching everywhere on the internet to find a database of crop circles that have been proven genuine through node elongation or expulsion. I cannot find a good database of node reports anywhere, but I think this is vitally important.

    My personal exploration of this subject is to approach it from the viewpoint of, “Nodes or it didn’t happen.” Hah! 🙂

    Thank you.

    • Melissa,
      Elongated or blown out growth nodes may well be a marker for crop circles which are not produced by mechanical stomping. BLT’s research is, as far as I know, the only scientific research on crop circles which has been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal, and their findings do suggest that only a subset of crop circles exhibit these findings. Much more scientific work needs to be accomplished to corroborate BLT’s findings and the conclusion that expanded and/or blown nodes are a valid and precise marker for CCs which are not produced by mechanical means (“stompers”).

      I am unaware of any complete, published list of CCs which BLT has studied which were determined to demonstrate the characteristic node changes you describe. I will contact Nancy Talbott at http://www.bltresearch.com to ask her whether or not she has compiled a complete list of crop circles that BLT has analyzed which were determined to exhibit expanded and/or blown out nodes. If she has such a list (and I suspect she would), I too would be most interested in obtaining a copy of that list to ascertain whether or not BLT has looked at the Jubilee Plantation CC and/or the White Sheet Hill CC formations. Both of these CCs appear to relate information re: scientific work which would, later that same year, receive a Nobel Prize in science. That this work would soon, in both instances and within 2-4 months, receive a Nobel Prize award is information that could not have been known by any human being at the time these two CCs were created (Nobel Prize recipients are not determined until October). If these two formations have previously been shown by BLT to have had plants with expanded or blown nodes, this would further strengthen the argument that these CCs could not be of human origin. I will get back to you on this, and thank you for your input.

      • Melissa,
        I contacted Nancy Talbott regarding your question about a list of CCs which have been discovered to exhibit the characteristic node changes – linearly expanded and /or blown out nodes (expulsion cavities). Nancy kindly responded this same day, informing me that no such list exists. Nancy suggested that I might comb through the BLT website to see if I can find information regarding any specific CC, information about which might be found on the BLT website. Sorry.A great deal more work needs to be done on the CC enigma.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.